RSS

CM4 Term Paper Brief

09 Sep

1
CM4 Term Paper Brief
January 2018
Option 2: Critically evaluate the potential of economic theory of construction
procurement as a decision-making tool in the selection of procurement systems.
Background
In this assignment, you are required to draw on a solid theoretical and evidential ground to
critically review the transaction cost theory of construction procurement. You are expected to
meet the following requirements:
1. Show a thorough understanding of TCE and its application to construction procurement
(i.e., explain the theory in your own way).
2. You can choose a context of interest, including non-private finance delivery systems
(traditional method, design-build, management system), Public-Private Partnerships or
collaborative delivery systems.
3. Conduct a literature review that is broad enough to cover most of the important techniques
suitable for procurement system selection and discuss their limitations.
4. Develop a framework to compare the strengths and limitations of existing techniques (TC
based and non-TC based approaches).
5. Building on the result of point 4, you should make a proposal for the way the TC based
theory can be transformed into a decision-aiding tool.
6. Apply the tool you propose to a real-life project and explore the additional insights, if any,
one might gain from the application of TC theory to procurement system selection (for
this, you can consider contrasting the suggestions made by the TC approach and other
methods and explain the disparity, if any.)
Word length
3000 words
Required readings
See the key papers of transaction cost theory of construction procurement in the bibliography
section. Read as many as you can.
Useful information sources/references
1. Your literature review is expected to cover important papers on construction procurement
from the leading project/construction/engineering management journals, including:
ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (A*)
2
International Journal of Project Management (A)
Construction Management and Economics (A)
ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering (A)
Building Research and Information (A)
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (A)
Project Management Journal (B)
2. Conventional delivery systems
1) The Bartlett library has many textbooks on construction procurement systems, such
as
A. Franks, J. 1998, Building Procurement Systems: A Client’s Guide, 3rd edition,
Longman, UK.
B. Masterman, J.W.E. 2001, An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems, E&FN
Spon, London, UK.
2) The following studies on procurement system selection could be useful
A. Sidwell, T. 2001, Literature Review- Value Alignment Process For Project
Delivery.
B. Love, P.E.D., R.M.Skitmore and G.Earl, 1998, Selecting A Suitable
Procurement Method for A Building Project,
Construction Management and
Economics
, 16, 221-233.
C. Skitmore R.M. and D.E. Marsden, 1988, Which Procurement System?
Towards A Universal Procurement Selection Technique,
Construction
Management and Construction,
6, 71-89.
3) HM Treasury’s Procurement Guide
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/infrastructure-procurement-route
map-a-guide-to-improving-delivery-capability
4) HM Treasury’s Green Book
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-eval
uation-in-central-governent
3. Public-Private Partnerships
1) World Bank (2014). Public-Private Parnterships: Reference Guide (Version 2).
Washington
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/09/09/public-private-refere
nce-guide-version-2
2) UK Private Finance 2 (PF2) procurement guides
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/private-finance-2-pf2
4. Collaborative delivery system
Cabinet Office (2014). New Models of Construction Procurement. London, HMSO.
Cost Led Procurement
Integrated Project Insurance
Two Stage Open Book
3
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/new-models-of-construction-procurement
4
Bibliography: Transaction cost theory of construction procurement
All papers are downloadable from my ResearchGate webpages.
1. Chang, C. & Shi Chen (2016) An Analysis of Transitional Public-Private Partnerships Model
in China: Contracting with little recourse to contracts.
Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management
.
2. Chang, C., & Qian, Y. (2015). An Econometric Analysis of Holdup Problems in
Construction Projects.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. doi:
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000957.
3. Chang, C., & Chou, H.Y. (2014). Transaction-Cost Approach to the Comparative Analysis
of User-Pay and Government-Pay Public-Private Partnership Systems.
Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management
. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000883
4. Chang, C. (2013). When Might A Project Company Break Up? The Perspective of
Risk-Bearing Capacity.
Construction Management and Economics, 31(12), 1186-1198.
doi:
10.1080/01446193.2013.868015
5. Chang, C. (2013). Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and
Its Critique.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.
doi:
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000779
6. Chang, C. (2013). A Critical Analysis of Recent Advances in the Techniques for the
Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects.
International Journal of Project Management, 31(7),
1057-1067. doi:
10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.001
7. Chang, C. (2013). A Critical Review of the Application of TCE in the Interpretation of
Risk Allocation in PPP Contracts.
Construction Management and Economics, 31(2), 99-103.
doi:
10.1080/01446193.2012.726365
8. Park, A., & Chang, C. (2013). Impacts of Construction Events on the Project Equity Value
of the Channel Tunnel Project.
Construction Economics and Management, 31(3), 223-237.
9. Chang, C. (2013). Understanding the Hold-up Problem in the Management of
Megaprojects: The Case of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link Project.
International Journal of
Project Management
, 31, 628-637. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.012
10. Chang, C., Ive., & G. (2007). Reversal of Bargaining Power in Construction Project:
meaning, existence and implications.
Construction Management and Economics, 25(8), 845-855.
doi:
10.1080/01446190601164113
11. Ive, G., & Chang, C. Y. (2007). The principle of inconsistent trinity in the selection of
procurement systems.
Construction Management and Economics, 25(7), 677-690.
doi:
10.1080/01446190601164089
12. Chang, C. Y., & Ive, G. (2007). The hold-up problem in the management of construction
projects: A case study of the Channel Tunnel.
International Journal of Project Management,
25(4), 394-404. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.001
5
13. Chang, C., Chou, H., & Wang, M. (2006). Characterising Corporate Governance of the
UK Listed Construction Companies.
Construction Management and Economics, 24(6), 647-656.
doi:
10.1080/01446190500529424
14. Chang, C. (2006). The determinants of the vertical boundaries of the construction firm:
Comment.
Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), 229-232.
doi:
10.1080/01446190500516579
15. Chang, C., & Ive, G. (2003). Discussion of “Model for Understanding, Preventing, and
Resolving Project Disputes” by Panagiotis Mitropoulos and Gregory Howell.
Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management
, 129(2), 231-233.
doi:
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:3(223
16. Chang, C., & Ive, G. (2002). Rethinking the multi-attribute approach based procurement
selection technique.
Construction Management and Economics, 20(3), 275-284.
doi:
10.1080/01446190110117608

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 9, 2018 in Academic Writing

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: