RSS

BBA 3210, Business Law 1

01 Aug


Unit Assignments
Unit I Assignment
Case Analysis
In light of your understanding of the civil and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process, consider the following scenario:
Pete was seriously injured when the four-wheeled all-terrain vehicle (ATV) he was driving through the trails behind his
house rolled over. As a result of his injuries, Pete is unable to work and has incurred $75,000 in medical bills. Pete has
filed a lawsuit against the ATV manufacturer to receive compensation for the financial harm resulting from his injuries.
Pete claims that the manufacturer defectively designed the ATV, causing it to have a tendency to roll over on rough
terrain.
The ATV manufacturer claims that the ATV is not defectively designed and that the rollover was caused by Pete driving at
an excessive rate of speed around a corner.
Consider the steps in civil litigation and ADR, and assess the factors that Pete and the ATV manufacturer will consider
when deciding whether they should settle this lawsuit. If you were Pete’s lawyer, what resolution would you advise? Be
sure to consider the primary forms of ADR and all ADR factors described in the lesson and textbook.

BBA 3210, Business Law 3
Finally, research and select at least one case from an outside source to support your resolution to the ATV case. Your
answer should be a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from these sources. Use APA
format to properly reference your information.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit II Assignment
Case Analysis
The Ford Pinto case is a well-known case that is often discussed in the context of business ethics. To summarize, Ford’s
design of the Pinto’s fuel tank was defective, causing fires if the Pinto was involved in even minor rear-end collisions. Ford
came to learn of the defect, but the company failed to correct it; Ford then predicted, based on a cost-benefit analysis, that
it would cost more to repair the defect ($11 per vehicle, or $137 million total) than it would to pay for damages resulting
from burn deaths, burn injuries, and burned vehicles ($47.5 million). Consider the Ford Pinto case in light of the who-how
(WH) framework for business ethics.
Would Ford’s decision to forego repairing the defective design comply with these ethical guidelines? If so, why? If not,
then what actions should Ford have taken to satisfy them? Explain your reasoning.
Your response to this question should be a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from
outside sources. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit III Assignment
Case Analysis
Burger King, the national franchise, is banned from opening a restaurant within 20 miles of Mattoon, Illinois. So, there is
not a Burger King there; no problem, right? Not so fast! In the late 1950s, Gene and Betty Hoots trademarked the iconic
name. Well, they trademarked it in Illinois at least. When the national company decided to open a chain close by, the
Hoots sued and won their case. However, the national chain was able to keep the name Burger King, but the Hoots were
also able to keep the name in accordance with the stipulation that the national chain could not open a store within a 20-
mile radius of the original store in Mattoon, Illinois.
In a minimum of 500 words, explain the reasons why this decision was made, and discuss the significance of this case in
U.S. trademark law jurisprudence.
For this assignment, please find one article from the CSU Online Library that discusses intellectual property; elaborate on
how the article relates to the Burger King case to support your answer. Identify the main issues with copyright and
trademark in the article, and explain how these issues were either upheld or overturned.
Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from the article. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit IV Essay
Case Analysis
eBay is one of the biggest online auctioning companies in the world. Buyers and sellers of all types are able to hop online,
put up something for sale, and sell it! Basically, the way it works is that you find something you want to bid on, place a bid
on it, and wait to see if your bid wins. If it does, you send your information to the seller, and in return, he or she sends you
your goods.
Is an eBay auction a legally-binding contract? In a minimum of 500 words, consider whether a bid placed in an online
auction on eBay is legally binding and, therefore, enforceable. Explain your reasoning using the elements of contract
analysis that you have learned thus far, including valid offer, valid acceptance, and the various forms of consideration.

BBA 3210, Business Law 4
Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from outside sources. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit V Assignment
Case Analysis
Determine whether certain contract remedies exist in the following scenario:
Forrest Gump is a famous table tennis player. He enters into a contract with Alabama Sports Marketing to advertise the
latest ping pong game and to serve as the computer-generated imagery (CGI) model for the development of the video
game. Gump is perfect for this job as there are not many world famous ping pong players who have a following similar to
his. The game is set to start development on March 1 and will be completed on July 31, so the game can be released at
Thanksgiving—a major video game release period. Both parties have agreed and stipulated to the fact that the game
must be completed on time to maximize the profits.
Gump will make 20% of the net proceeds from the sales of the game. In addition, the contract has a liquidated damages
clause that indicates that if Gump does not participate in the marketing, does not serve as the CGI model, or breaches the
contract in any way, he will owe Alabama Sports Marketing $2 million.
Based on this fact pattern and the information presented in this unit, answer the following questions in a minimum of 250
words each.
1. One day, Gump gets into an argument with the developer. Gump refuses to perform any work until the problem is
solved. In this situation, can Alabama Sports Marketing seek specific performance of the contract? If yes, why? If no, why
not?
2. How would the court determine whether the liquidated damages clause is valid? Is this clause valid? Explain your
answers.
Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from outside sources. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit VI Assignment
Final Contract Analysis
Note: This is a two-part assignment that consists of two different contract analysis scenarios. Please answer both
scenarios on one document, and upload it to Blackboard.
Contract analysis scenario one
damages determination: Alfred and Barbara own adjoining farms in Dry County, an area
where all agriculture requires irrigation. Alfred bought a well-drilling rig and drilled a 400-foot well from which he drew
drinking water. Barbara needed no additional irrigation water, but in January 1985, she asked Alfred on what terms he
would drill a well near her house to supply better-tasting drinking water than the county water she has been using for
years. Alfred said that because he had never before drilled a well for hire, he would charge Barbara only $10 per foot,
about one dollar more than his expected cost. Alfred said that he would drill to a maximum depth of 600 feet, which is the
deepest his rig could reach. Barbara said, “OK—as long as you can guarantee completion by June 1, we have a deal.”
Alfred agreed, and he asked for $3,500 in advance, with any further payment or refund to be made on completion.
Barbara said, “OK,” and she paid Alfred $3,500.
Alfred started to drill on May 1. He had reached a depth of 200 feet on May 10 when his drill struck rock and broke,
plugging the hole. The accident was unavoidable. It had cost Alfred $12 per foot to drill this 200 feet. Alfred said he would
not charge Barbara for drilling the useless hole in the ground, but he would have to start a new well close by and could not
promise its completion before July 1.
Barbara, annoyed by Alfred’s failure, refused to let him start another well. On June 1, she contracted with Carl to drill a
well. Carl agreed to drill to a maximum depth of 350 feet for $4,500, which Barbara also paid in advance, but Carl could
not start drilling until October 1. He completed drilling and struck water at 300 feet on October 30.

BBA 3210, Business Law 5
In July, Barbara sued Alfred, seeking to recover her $3,500 paid to Alfred, plus the $4,500 paid to Carl.
On August 1, Dry County’s dam failed, thus reducing the amount of water available for irrigation. Barbara lost her apple
crop worth $15,000. The loss could have been avoided by pumping from Barbara’s well if it had been operational by
August 1. Barbara amended her complaint to add the $15,000 loss.
In a minimum of a 1,000-word contract analysis, discuss Barbara’s suit against Alfred. What are Barbara’s rights, and
what damages, if any, will she recover?
Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from outside sources. Use APA format.
Contract analysis scenario two
remedies determination: Mundo manufactures printing presses. Extra, a publisher of a
local newspaper, had decided to purchase new presses. Rep, a representative of Mundo, met with Boss, the president of
Extra, to describe the advantages of Mundo’s new press. Rep also drew rough plans of the alterations that would be
required in Extra’s pressroom to accommodate the new presses, including additional floor space and new electrical
installations, and Rep left the plans with Boss.
On December 1, Boss received a letter signed by Seller, a member of Mundo’s sales staff, offering to sell the required
number of presses at a cost of $2.4 million. The offer contained provisions relating to the delivery schedule, warranties,
and payment terms but did not specify a particular mode of acceptance of the offer. Boss immediately decided to accept
the offer and telephoned Seller’s office. Seller was out of town, and Boss left the following message: “Looks good. I’m
sold. Call me when you get back so we can discuss details.”
Using the rough plans drawn by Rep, Boss also directed that work begin on the necessary pressroom renovations. By
December 4, a wall had been demolished in the pressroom, and a contract had been signed for the new electrical
installations.
On December 5, the President of the United States announced a ban on foreign imports of computerized heavy
equipment. The ban removed—from the American market—a foreign manufacturer that had been the only competitor of
Mundo. That afternoon, Boss received an email from Mundo stating, “All outstanding offers are withdrawn.” In a
subsequent telephone conversation, Seller told Boss that Mundo would not deliver the presses for less than $2.9 million.
In a minimum of a 1,000-word contract analysis, discuss the following questions: Was Mundo obligated to sell the presses
to Extra for $2.4 million? Assume Mundo was so obligated. What are Extra’s rights and remedies against Mundo?
Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from outside sources. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Unit VII Assignment
Case Analysis
Dave is a driver for Empire Courier Service. Around the company, Dave is known as sort of a hothead. During his
previous employment at another company, Dave had been involved in a workplace fistfight with a fellow employee,
resulting in criminal charges.
One day, between deliveries and in a company vehicle, Dave decides to get lunch. While leaving the parking lot at Big
Burrito Bistro, the favorite lunch spot for most Empire Courier employees, Dave negligently causes a car accident with
another vehicle, resulting in injuries to Victor, the driver of the other car. As Dave and Victor are waiting on the side of the
road for the police to arrive, Victor comments to Dave, “Oh, you drive for Empire Courier Service. It doesn’t surprise me
that Empire hires bad drivers because their service stinks, and their prices are too high!” Dave is so offended that Victor
would insult his employer’s professional reputation that he punches Victor in the face, causing Victor to suffer even more
injuries. Empire Courier Service does not, as a matter of policy, do criminal background checks on its employees.
Considering the legal principles discussed in Chapter 20, explain who is liable for Dave’s negligence for causing the car
accident, and explain who is liable for Dave’s intentional tort for punching Victor. Provide your answers in a case analysis
of a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from outside sources. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.

BBA 3210, Business Law 6
APA Guidelines
The application of the APA writing style shall be practical, functional, and appropriate to each academic level, with the
primary purpose being the documentation (citation) of sources. CSU requires that students use APA style for certain
papers and projects. Students should always carefully read and follow assignment directions and review the associated
grading rubric when available. Students can find CSU’s Citation Guide by clicking
here. This document includes examples
and sample papers and provides information on how to contact the CSU Success Center.
Grading Rubrics
This course utilizes analytic grading rubrics as tools for your professor in assigning grades for all learning activities. Each
rubric serves as a guide that communicates the expectations of the learning activity and describes the criteria for each
level of achievement. In addition, a rubric is a reference tool that lists evaluation criteria and can help you organize your
efforts to meet the requirements of that learning activity. It is imperative for you to familiarize yourself with these rubrics
because these are the primary tools your professor uses for assessing learning activities.
Rubric categories include: (1) Discussion Board, (2) Assessment (Written Response), and (3) Assignment. However, it is
possible that not all of the listed rubric types will be used in a single course (e.g., some courses may not have
Assessments).
The Discussion Board rubric can be found within Unit I’s Discussion Board submission instructions.
The Assessment (Written Response) rubric can be found embedded in a link within the directions for each Unit
Assessment. However, these rubrics will only be used when written-response questions appear within the Assessment.
Each Assignment type (e.g., article critique, case study, research paper) will have its own rubric. The Assignment rubrics
are built into Blackboard, allowing students to review them prior to beginning the Assignment and again once the
Assignment has been scored. This rubric can be accessed via the Assignment link located within the unit where it is to be
submitted. Students may also access the rubric through the course menu by selecting “Tools” and then “My Grades.”
Again, it is vitally important for you to become familiar with these rubrics because their application to your
Discussion Boards, Assessments, and Assignments is the method by which your instructor assigns all grades.
Final Examination Guidelines
Final Exams are to be administered to students by an approved Proctor. CSU approves two flexible proctoring options: a
standard Proctor, who is chosen by the student and approved by the university, or Remote Proctor Now (RP Now), an ondemand, third-party testing service that proctors examinations for a small fee.
Students choosing RP Now must have an operational webcam/video with audio, a high-speed Internet connection, and
the appropriate system rights required to download and install software.
To review the complete Examination Proctor Policy, including a list of acceptable Proctors, Proctor responsibilities,
Proctor approval procedures, and the Proctor Agreement Form, go to the myCSU Student Portal from the link below.
http://mycsu.columbiasouthern.edu
You are permitted four (4) hours to complete this exam in the presence of your approved Proctor. This is an open book
exam. Only course textbooks, writing utensils, and a calculator, if necessary, are allowed when taking proctored exams.
Other materials are not permitted unless specified in the examination instructions and only the sources identified in the
instructions may be used as source material.
Communication Forums
These are non-graded discussion forums that allow you to communicate with your professor and other students.
Participation in these discussion forums is encouraged, but not required. You can access these forums with the buttons in
the Course Menu. Instructions for subscribing/unsubscribing to these forums are provided below.

BBA 3210, Business Law 7
Click here for instructions on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and post to the Communication Forums.
Ask the Professor
This communication forum provides you with an opportunity to ask your professor general or course content questions.
Questions may focus on Blackboard locations of online course components, textbook or course content elaboration,
additional guidance on assessment requirements, or general advice from other students.
Questions that are specific in nature, such as inquiries regarding assessment/assignment grades or personal
accommodation requests, are NOT to be posted on this forum. If you have questions, comments, or concerns of a nonpublic nature, please feel free to email your professor. Responses to your post will be addressed or emailed by the
professor within 48 hours.
Before posting, please ensure that you have read all relevant course documentation, including the syllabus,
assessment/assignment instructions, faculty feedback, and other important information.
Student Break Room
This communication forum allows for casual conversation with your classmates. Communication on this forum should
always maintain a standard of appropriateness and respect for your fellow classmates. This forum should NOT be used to
share assessment answers.

Grading
Discussion Boards (8 @ 2%)
= 16%
Assessments (3 @ 8%) = 24%
Assignments (5 @ 4%) = 20%
Unit IV Essay = 4%
Unit VI Assignment = 21%
Final Exam = 15%
Total =100%

Course Schedule/Checklist (PLEASE PRINT)
The following pages contain a printable Course Schedule to assist you through this course. By following this schedule,
you will be assured that you will complete the course within the time allotted.

BBA 3210, Business Law 8

By following this schedule, you will be assured that you will complete the course within the time allotted. Please keep this
schedule for reference as you progress through your course.
Unit I The Nature of Law, Judicial Process, and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Review: Unit Study Guide
Read: Chapter 1: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Dynamic Business Law
Chapter 3: The U.S. Legal System and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by Saturday,
11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Assignment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Notes/Goals:
Unit II Administrative Law, Business Ethics, and Social Responsibility
Review: Unit Study Guide
Read: Chapter 2: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility, pp. 13-22
Chapter 4: Administrative Law, pp. 54-71
Suggested Reading: See Study Guide
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Assessment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Assignment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Proctor Approval Form
Notes/Goals:
Unit III Real, Personal, and Intellectual Property
Review: Unit Study Guide
Read: Chapter 8: Real, Personal, and Intellectual Property, pp. 150-170
Suggested Reading: See Study Guide
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Assessment: by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Assignment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Notes/Goals:

BBA 3210, Business Law 9

Unit IV Contracts Part I: The Nature of Contracts and Agreements
Review: Unit Study Guide
Learning Activities (Non-Graded): See Study Guide
Read: Chapter 9: Introduction to Contracts and Agreement, pp. 173-189
Chapter 10: Consideration, pp. 192-203
Suggested Reading: See Study Guide
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Essay by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Notes/Goals:
Unit V Contracts Part II: Assent, Discharge and Remedies, Third-Party Contracts
Review: Unit Study Guide
Read: Chapter 12: Reality of Assent, pp. 225-238
Chapter 14: Discharge and Remedies, pp. 270-287
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Assessment: by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Assignment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Notes/Goals:
Unit VI Sales and Lease Contracts and the Uniform Commercial Code
Review: Unit Study Guide
Read: Chapter 15: Formation and Performance of Sales and Lease Contracts, pp. 291-308
Chapter 16: Sales and Lease Contracts: Performance, Warranties, and Remedies, pp. 312-328
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Assignment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Notes/Goals:

BBA 3210, Business Law 10

Unit VII Agency and Liability
Review: Unit Study Guide
Read: Chapter 20: Agency and Liability to Third Parties, pp. 410-436
Suggested Reading: See Study Guide
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Assignment by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Request to take Final Exam
Notes/Goals:
Unit VIII Business Organizations
Review: Unit Study Guide
Learning Activities (Non-Graded): See Study Guide
Read: Chapter 21: Forms of Business Organization, pp. 439-457
Discuss: Discussion Board Response: Submit your response to the Discussion Board question by
Saturday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Discussion Board Comment: Comment on another student’s Discussion Board response by
Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Submit: Final Exam by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. (Central Time)
Notes/Goals:

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 1, 2017 in academic writing, Academic Writing

 

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: